Published in Issue 17 of State magazine, Spring 2015
cor·pus /'kôrpəs/ n. pl. cor·po·ra (-pr-) 1. A large collection of writings of a specific kind or on a specific subject. 2. A collection of writings or recorded remarks used for linguistic analysis. 3. The main part of a bodily structure or organ. //Reviews of art. Art and language. Art and the body.
Showing posts with label Maria Stenfors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Maria Stenfors. Show all posts
Friday, 24 April 2015
The Independents: Paul Stolper, Maria Stenfors, Rebecca May Marston (Limoncello)
Wednesday, 19 March 2014
Review of Astrid Svangren at Maria Stenfors
19/03/14
Astrid
Svangren:
before
me: I roll in the snow/ rotating/ raveling/ turned/ twisted/ to an expression
of instance
behind
me: peonies/ disassemble/ loosen up/ breaking down/ collapsing
beside
me: enfleurage/ ointmentlike/ perfumed solids/ without body/ engulfed/
collected/ to a given
under me:
loose materials/ mishmash/ knocking/ beating/ leaf buds/ opening/ chlorophyll/
watercolor/ unfolding/ fold in
over me:
froth of sugar/ corals/ sea anemones/ jellyfish/ seasnails/ all is viewed/
lulling/ as long as it lasts
Maria
Stenfors
14 March
– 26 April 2014
Swedish-born, Copenhagen-resident artist Astrid
Svangren (b. 1972) is not one for short titles. The above poem serves as both
the title of the exhibition and as the title of each of the seven works within.
And actually it describes them better than any other combination of words I
might seek to contrive. I can but try, regardless.
Candy coloured sheets of plexiglass hang like
barriers, separating one world from another; one dream’s landscape colliding
with a fragment of the next; a window; a mirror; a wall.
Blue: like the ocean, inscribed with the words of the
poem-cum-all-purpose-title, scratched and scuffed, graffitied, distorting what
lies on either side.
Pink: daubed with candlewax and cellophane. Like sweet
wrappers or confetti. The ground upon which a painting has been born. Look a
little closer and maybe it’s not as enticing as it seems. Is there something
awry in this gingerbread house? Was it the scene of a tussle? Of something more
angry and violent? Are the stains and substances not what one at first
perceives?
Black and white: hung flat against the wall. Like a
net curtain, there’s the desire to lift a corner and peak through the window.
Black scrawls and red splashes. Again we pause to question whether we’d
actually want to see more, were we able. Two pink silk crescents at the top: horns
or lingerie, either way the suggestion is of adult play…
…which involves, perhaps, the cascade of ostrich
feathers hanging nearby?...
…themselves mirrored by a tumbling down of yellow silk
and horsehair, cellophane and elastic strings. Each work takes something from
the last and passes something on to the next. There is a narrative being woven,
albeit with breaks. These fragments – each from a story of their own – come
together to tell an overarching other.
And fragments from each are hung out to dry on the
frame in the neighbouring room. Dried lemons, hair grips, Japanese silk,
balloons, metal wire, tights, sponge, beads… Domestic yet strangely uncanny, an
unknown magic or voodoo. Again, drawing you in to peer curiously, but then that
recurrent uncertainty: Will I like what I find?
At the farthest corner, a mirror reflects it all back.
Daubed and scratched, smeared and painted over. Standing too low to be seen
into without crouching. Black roots reaching into the ground – that which
persists, stubborn and resilient, or that which takes root afresh, striving
forth towards a new existence, the next life, reincarnation? The caterpillar
becomes the moth. Or is it the butterfly?
Who is directing this tale? The dream or the dreamer? The
artist or the viewer? all is viewed/
lulling/ as long as it lasts.
Thursday, 28 March 2013
Review of Julia Pfeiffer: Figures of the Thinkable at Maria Stenfors
28/03/13
Julia Pfeiffer:
Figures of the Thinkable
Maria Stenfors
27 February – 6 April
2013
Walking in to Maria Stenfors’ lofty gallery, you are
currently faced with an amazing sight: a wall of clay, cracked and dessicated,
barren and bare (Building the
Labyrinth, 2013). It could be one of Alberto Burri’s Cretti, but it’s not. It’s a shrine to
all that has been, has failed to be, could still be, but isn’t yet. Representing
the full life cycle of her works, Berlin-based artist Julia Pfeiffer has
constructed this wall of clay, slathered on to the existing gallery wall with
thick palette knife strokes, out of discarded off cuts from failed and unwanted
works, which she allowed to dry right out, before adding water and remoulding
them almost as paint. Underneath are layers of actual paint, which could themselves
be depicting an image – but who can know, or ever will? The wall is heavy, not
only with the weight of the material, but with the possible figures and forms
that abide therein.
And as you stand and ponder the imponderable, you are,
yourself, being watched. For behind you, lined up in an intimidating row, are
eight eyes, staring penetratingly ahead (Iris
Studies, 2013). Made of ceramic, and glazed with special pens which
allow colour to be applied in a painterly manner, these extracted eyeballs gaze
voyeuristically, dreaming the dream of what might have been and what may still
develop. Removed from their surrounds, they are no longer figurative, but
purely symbolic. Freud, no doubt, would have had a scopophilic field day.
Pfeiffer doesn’t just work with clay, but also with canvas,
which she paints with grand expressionistic gestures, spread out on the floor,
before hanging the resulting scene as a backdrop for an installation, which,
itself, then becomes a black and white photograph. There are four of these on
display, each depicting an equally uncanny interior, none of which actually
exists. That said, the toppling
liquid-filled dog, which occurs first in Stages
(Vessel Tilting) (2013), does also feature in the exhibition, as a vision
made real: the possible made actual, a dream become reality (Animal Vessel (Figure of the Unthinkable),
2013). But distorted as ever, the ceramic creature must sit upon two supports,
as his oversized genitals hang down uncomfortably in between.
Whilst, in this instance, an image has become an object, a
ceramic slab standing upon an easel nearby renders a 3D character from a mug (sadly
not on display) almost as flat as a painting (Body Relief (Figure of the Thinkable), 2013). Here, the woman, whose breasts
on the mug are, so I am told, doomed to tip up every time the drinker takes a
sip, has been relieved of her physical discomfort and elevated in status from a
mildly distasteful comic item to a virtually 2D work of art – the reverse fate
of the pitifully encumbered dog.
This sense of humour permeates much of Pfeiffer’s work, and,
again, one can but imagine the father of psychoanalysis’s joy at many of the
innuendos and interpretations offered up. Indeed, to return to the wall of
broken dreams, with its visions of the past, present and future, and the eyes
which gaze eternally upon it, trying to make something out of the blank canvas
it offers – what more is this exhibition than an invitation to the visitor to
unleash his or her own imagination as to how the story might unfold?
Images:
Building the Labyrinth
2013
Iris Study: blue
2013
Stages (Vessel Tilting)
2013
Animal Vessel (Figure of the Unthinkable)
2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













