11/05/16
Periscope - Don't Miss
Published in issue 21 (summer 2016) of F22 magazine
cor·pus /'kôrpəs/ n. pl. cor·po·ra (-pr-) 1. A large collection of writings of a specific kind or on a specific subject. 2. A collection of writings or recorded remarks used for linguistic analysis. 3. The main part of a bodily structure or organ. //Reviews of art. Art and language. Art and the body.
Showing posts with label Ben Uri. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ben Uri. Show all posts
Wednesday, 11 May 2016
Thursday, 8 January 2015
Review of Refiguring the 50s at Ben Uri
08/01/15
Refiguring the 50s
Ben Uri, London
14 November 2014 – 22 February 2015
Exhibitions at Ben Uri are
reliably educative, offer a historical overview, bring together artists whose
work deserves comparison or joint consideration, and provide rigorous yet
accessible literature, both on the gallery walls and in the accompanying
publications. Refiguring the 50s is no exception. The exhibition collects the
work of five figurative painters working in Britain in the 50s: Joan Eardley (1921-1963),
Sheila Fell (1931-1979), Eva Frankfurther (1930-1959), Josef Herman (1911-2000)
and LS Lowry (1887-1976). Each is distinctive in his or her style, but a common
interest in society, working people as subject matter and the underlying human
condition provides a thread which strings the works together and allows the
gallery, and curator Sarah MacDougall, to spin a narrative and create a vivid
picture of the era and its social change, patchworking together these various
viewpoints.
To read this review, please go to: http://www.studiointernational.com/index.php/refiguring-the-50s-ben-uri-joan-eardley-sheila-fell-josef-herman-ls-lowry
Monday, 6 January 2014
Review of Uproar! The First 50 Years of the London Group 1913-1963 at Ben Uri Museum and Gallery
06/01/14
Uproar! The First 50 Years of the London Group 1913-1963
Ben Uri Museum and Gallery
31 October 2013 – 2 March 2014
When Mark Gertler exhibited The Creation of Eve (1914) at the London
Group’s third show in 1915, he was as shocked by the reaction of the public as
they apparently were by his painting. The press accused him of “calculated and
unpleasant sensationalism”[i], “deliberate
eccentricity”[ii]
and “impertinence, with a seasoning of blasphemy”[iii].
Looking at the work today, it is hard to imagine how it might have engendered
such a frenzied and uproarious response, but such was the mood prevailing in
the early decades of the last century. The London Group itself was set up in
opposition to the art establishment, from the start being billed as the
alternative not only to the Royal Academy but to the reigning
anti-establishment exhibiting society, the New English Art Club (NEAC). Jacob
Epstein is credited with having coined the name at a meeting held on 15
November 1913, and it was considered
an appropriately all-encompassing moniker, in contrast to such locally named groups as the Fitzroy Street Group and
the Camden Town Group.
To read the rest of this review, please go to: http://www.studiointernational.com/index.php/uproar-the-first-50-years-of-the-london-group-1913-1963
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


