Sunday, 29 April 2012

Review of Phil Illingworth: Frightening Albert at WW Gallery

29/04/12

Phil Illingworth: Frightening Albert
WW Gallery
11 April – 5 May 2012

In 1920, American psychologist John B. Watson carried out an experiment on a 9-month-old baby, known only as Little Albert, investigating the phenomena of stimulus-response and human conditioning. Initially unafraid, and happy to watch and play with a white rat, the infant was then exposed to loud noises whenever he saw the creature, and subsequently began to fear not only the rat itself, but also various other furry objects. In Phil Illingworth’s exhibition, which takes its name from this notorious experiment, and which marks the opening of WW Gallery’s new space in Hatton Garden, deep in London’s jewel district, visitors are confronted with a number of peculiar artworks, which could themselves be objects from a modern day social behavioural experiment. The works, Illingworth claims, are about painting, yet there is one solitary example of paint on canvas (Block, 2012), with the rest of the show exploring painting in 3D, and employing a variety of tactile materials in bright colours and unusual combinations, testing the audience’s response both to the works themselves, and, of course, also to the new gallery location.


Echoes abound of experimental artists from the past, including Barry Flanagan (with the arte povera elements of his early works, consisting of material bundles and ropes) and art informel protagonist Alberto Burri (see here Caput mortuum, 2012, a large hanging sheet, covered in cracked white acrylic paint, redolent of Burri’s Cretto series). Certain elements and shapes recur from one work to the next, as if conditioning the visitor as he proceeds through the show. So, for example, the single striped “straw”, projecting from the wall in The Martyrdom of St Agatha (2011), multiplies to a family in Fe fi fo fum (2011), and the artificial grass, coloured a threatening black like fresh tarmac in A pause in the segue (2012), reappears in a small circular section of Speciality Act (2012), a folding egg-shaped work, closing the clockwise trail around the exhibition.



Perhaps the most scientific works on show are the eponymous Frightening Albert (2011) and Gadzooks (2012), both of which contain nylon monofilaments, curling vaguely upwards, but with the suggestion that they might respond to touch, like the strands on a static lamp. Nigel’s Edges (2012) and Convergence (2012) similarly incorporate wires and strings respectively, with the latter relating to the three wires in a plug, the longest “earth” wire coloured brown.


The two-room, L-shaped gallery, resplendent in its whiteness, could indeed be mistaken for a lab, and it would be no great leap to imagine oneself shut in there alone, left to play with the objects on display, perhaps subject to video observation from afar, as part of some social experiment. Like a hamster in a cage with a new wheel, how do we react? Do we follow the prescribed trail? Do we linger at certain works remembering something we have seen before? Do we reach out to touch, or flinch and move on? And, as we emerge at the end of the test, what is our judgment? Is the glass of water in Cara Mia (2011) half full or half empty? Well, if this exhibition is a taste of things to come, the WW glass is certainly at least half full, for this is a very successful and promising launch to their new gallery space.


Images: 


84% agree
Image courtesy of the WW Gallery
© Phil Illingworth



Speciality Act 
Image courtesy of the WW Gallery
© Phil Illingworth



Cara Mia
Image courtesy of the WW Gallery
© Phil Illingworth



Also published at: http://www.rovesandroams.com/2012/04/phil-illingworth-frightening-albert-at-ww-gallery/

Sunday, 15 April 2012

The Bloomberg Commission: Josiah McElheny: The Past Was A Mirage I’d Left Far Behind at the Whitechapel Gallery


15/04/12
The Bloomberg Commission: Josiah McElheny: The Past Was A Mirage I’d Left Far Behind
Whitechapel Gallery
7 September 2011 – 20 July 2012

The Whitechapel library was built in 1892 as a ‘lantern for learning,’ and its reading rooms did indeed bring Enlightenment values to many a poor Londoner. With this history in mind, New York-based sculptor, performance artist, writer and film maker, Josiah McElheny (born 1966), has used his current Bloomberg Commission to turn what is now an exhibition space in the Whitechapel Gallery into a hall of kaleidoscopic lights and mirrors, multiplying, distorting, and refracting his reconfigurations of experimental abstract films from early 20th century Europe.

The gallery is filled with seven large-scale sculptures, built out of flat mirrors, positioned at varying angles to white cloth projection screens, which the visitor can walk amongst, disoriented by the flickering lights and images, their inversions, reflections, and movements, becoming part of the larger work, as his image is also captured in and projected by the larger than life looking glasses.


During the silence, lines of bright white light shoot across the screens, moving fast, fragmenting, redirecting themselves. Flashes, like bursts of electrical current, charge in all directions, almost audibly fizzling, fusing, firing like neurons. On a small screen in the far corner, as part of a reconfiguration of a short film called Fragment, a full breasted torso is inverted and floats across the cloth, moving in and out of a geometric structure, echoic of the early Modernist architecture from the period of the films selected.

The most mesmerising segment is, however, Lichtertanz (‘Dance of lights’), in which, to a soundtrack of discordant piano music, lines and dots of light cavort here and there, escaping the boundaries of the screens and planes, reproducing, flickering, extinguishing, and renewing themselves. Some appear to be glowing match heads, others night-time street lights, emanating from their source projection, and enveloping the visitor in their other world magic, transporting him to a street lit city of yesteryear. Yes, it may all be a mirage, but, for the duration of your visit to the gallery, it is real. If this is the past, it has been captured and reborn, shattered and scattered, like figments of a dream, leaping for freedom and eternal existence beyond the confines of a solitary memory. Reinvented and relived, these bedazzling moments are shared and taken away by many a new memory holder.

Images:

Josian McElheny
The Past Was A Mirage I'd Left Far Behind
2011
Installation View
Photo: Todd-White Art Photography


Sunday, 8 April 2012

Review of Quentin Blake: As Large as Life at the Foundling Museum


07/04/12
Quentin Blake: As Large as Life
The Foundling Museum
12 January – 15 April 2012

The Foundling Hospital was set up in 1739 by Captain Charles Coram, following nearly 20 years of campaigning, and finally being granted a Royal charter by George II. During the 18th century, nearly 1,000 babies each year were abandoned in the streets of London, and, without such philanthropic causes as Coram’s, they were simply left to perish. The Foundling Museum, set up in 1998 in the original building on Coram’s Fields, tells the story of the hospital and some of its early children. It also contains a number of works of art by William Hogarth (1697-1764) and his contemporaries. Hogarth, as one of the founding governors of the hospital, initiated the idea that artists might donate paintings and sculptures in order to attract wealthy, polite society, in the hope that they might make donations for the care of the children.


To read the rest of this review, please go to: http://diary.darlingcollective.com/?p=470 



Wednesday, 4 April 2012

Review of Damien Hirst at Tate Modern

04/04/12
Damien Hirst
Tate Modern
4 April – 9 September 2012

“I think that was the thing about our generation, we got our whole history of art from books. I remember at college they were saying to us, ‘You must go and actually see these works,’ and I remember thinking, ‘Why bother?’” explains Damien Hirst (born 1965) in an interview with the Director of the Tate, Nicholas Serota. And that is probably how a lot of people feel now about Hirst’s own works. Ubiquitous as they are, I certainly had the impression of knowing them all only too well, despite not having ever experienced them, as it were, in the flesh. In my case, however, that made me all the more excited to rectify this false memory, and, having now stood close enough to see my breath on the many vitrines, feel tempted to try blowing the balls from their precarious balances upon air jets above hairdryers and large coloured boxes, read the labels on the sides of medicine bottles and placebo pills, and see my own reflection in the mirrors set behind rows of diamonds, I do have to conclude that “bothering” is indeed worth it – even if, sceptical as many critics of Hirst’s work are, not for the experience of seeing the actual works themselves, then at least for the experience of seeing how others respond to them. As Chris Dercon, Director of Tate Modern, says: “We love to watch other people watch Damien Hirst.”



Whatever you think of him, it cannot be denied that Hirst is one of the most significant figures in British art from the last quarter of a century, bursting on to the scene back in 1988 when he curated Freeze, a show of his own and his fellow Goldsmiths students’ works in a disused warehouse. His own works on display included Edge (1988) and Row (1988), some of his very first spot paintings, painted directly on to the walls. These, along with the earliest itself, Spot Painting (1986), are included in this retrospective. It was around this time that Hirst says he realised he wouldn’t really fit into the art world if it remained as it was, and so, what to do? Get out there and change it!

Hirst is certainly a very prolific artist, and this show, his first major survey in the UK, has been described by the curatorial team as being “like a big cinema production; an architectural endeavour.” They had to be very selective, but, whilst the main focus of the exhibition is on the 10 years in which he established his artistic vocabulary, it also includes most of his seminal works, and a good representation of his main thematic categories.


One inevitable candidate for inclusion was The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living (1991) – Hirst’s shark suspended in formaldehyde – which, created with the intent of provoking some profound primal fear, actually, upon direct confrontation, is so bloodless and white, so drained and lifeless, so wrinkled, pallid and weak, that it is almost a humbling experience, and not at all fear-inspiring. Commissioned by Saatchi, this piece is nevertheless powerful in what it achieved, as it is seen as marking the start of the YBA era.

A Thousand Years (1990), another iconic work, and Hirst’s first vitrine, depicts the life cycle of flies, starting with maggots hatching in a white box, developing into flies, feeding on a severed cows head, and then going on to reproduce, and, in many cases, to die at the hands of a malevolently glowing insect-o-cutor. The blood from the cow’s head is so dark it’s almost black, and, as with the shark, it is a challenging task to convince oneself of the truth and accept this as something real. Hirst describes the creation of this work as his “Frankenstein moment,” as it was the first time he killed something in the name of art.

After flies, Hirst moved on to butterflies, with In and Out of Love (1991), which was created for his first solo exhibition in London. The two part installation consists of eight large butterfly “paintings,” which are not actually paintings at all, but dead butterflies mounted on large monochrome canvases behind glass, and a whole room full of butterflies, into which the visitor can enter. White canvases on the wall are adorned with pupae, hatching in the first few weeks of the show, and the resulting butterflies then feed on plants, sugar solution and fruit, whilst flitting from shoulder to shoulder, and note pad to hand bag, as the unsuspecting visitor becomes part of the living vitrine. The life span of the butterflies – all of which are far from your common or garden cabbage white – is, on average, two weeks, and so new supplies will be being imported regularly. As with the flies in A Thousand Years, the deceased exemplars will be left to mount up, adding to the work as time proceeds. Some might say that this is not art, and that you should go to a butterfly house if this is the experience you desire, and yes, it is indeed more about the experience than about “art,” but what is “art” if not an aesthetic experience? And this is certainly one to touch the senses.


Perhaps the most monumental animal work, however, is Mother and Child Divided (1993), a four-part installation, in which a cow and her calf are bisected and encased in vitrines of formaldehyde. From the external side view, the calf looks innocent and fluffy, almost serene, and from the inside, there is a compact precision to its innards, almost perfectly untouched. Its mother’s organs, however, appear, in stark contrast, worn and torn, like crumpled paper or fabric, dirty rags, and deflated balloons. Ageing and decay paradoxically preserved.

Hirst’s exploration of life and death extends beyond just the life cycles of insects and animals, to include also humans and symbolic references. An early memento mori, for example, is a photograph in which a teenage Hirst poses alongside a specimen head from the anatomy department at Leeds University, Dead Head (1991). His myriad works with cigarettes also stem from his view of the act of smoking as representing a “mini life cycle.”



“There are four important things in life: religion, love, art and science,” says Hirst. And these recur in many of his series as well. The Medicine Cabinets, for example, are representative both of science, but also give an oblique visualisation of the body, as the remedies contained are appropriate for different ailments and organs. The exhibition seems to be overrun with these cabinets, ranging from his first one, Sinner (1988), containing the personal prescriptions his grandmother gave to him before she died, through Pharmacy (1992), a large-scale installation filling an entire room, to Trinity – Pharmacology, Physiology, Pathology (2000), showcasing surgical teaching aids and implements. In some, packages and bottles are lined up neatly, in others, individual pills are laid out at angles, their colours echoing the patterns of the Spot Paintings. Whether or not this was deliberate, Hirst certainly exploits colour in a schematic and ordered way. As he explains to Serota, “the thing that was causing me the problems in painting was colour, finding a structure where I could lay it down, be in control of it rather than it controlling me.” And this is what the Spot series allowed him to do: arrange the colours in spots of uniform size and shape, laid out in a precise grid structure. His later Spin Paintings, however, seem to depart from this rigidity, with the colours being left to take charge and splash at whim across the circular canvases. Similarly, his recent return to the butterfly motif, arranged in kaleidoscopic, mandala-like forms to produce works reminiscent of stained glass windows (for example, Doorways to the Kingdom of Heaven, 2007), are also a panoply of colour.


Then, of course, there are the diamonds. No one can think of Hirst without thinking of these. The penultimate room contains the breathtaking Judgement Day (2009), a gold cabinet filled with 30,000 manufactured diamonds. Majestic, dazzling, stunning and awe-inspiring, the jewels refract the spectrum and reflect light, sending out rays of colour, again echoing the Spot Paintings and pills. In addition, the visitor sees himself reflected in the mirrors behind. “It’s definitely all about feeling like King Midas,” comments Hirst. On the opposite wall is a cabinet of cigarette butts, The Abyss (2008), arranged at angles, like semaphore code. The contrast between beauty and ugliness couldn’t be more blunt: “I like all those opposites. […] In an artwork I always try to say something and deny it at the same time.”

Finally (and that isn’t to say I have mentioned even a cross sample of the seventy plus works on display), the notorious skull, For the Love of God (2007), is being displayed in its own little black room in the Turbine Hall. (Entry to this is free, unlike the main exhibition upstairs, but it is only there until 24 June.) Made from a life-size platinum cast of an 18th century human skull, and encrusted with 8,601 flawless diamonds, inset with a 52.4 carat pink diamond in the centre of the forehead, this piece represents the pinnacle of the contemporary art world’s obsession with value and consumerism. In terms of Hirst himself, it takes us full circle from where he began, as a student in Leeds, jokily posing for the photo Dead Head, but also encapsulates how he has moved on, made money, played with concepts of value, and questioned life and death. It acts as both a symbol of death, but also a celebration of life. In Hirst’s own words: “Art’s about life and it can’t really be about anything else. There isn’t anything else.” Life is for living and making the most of, and, whether you love him or hate him for it, that is certainly something this artist has done. Don’t just read about him in the history books, come and judge for yourself.

Images:

Damien Hirst
Lullaby, the Seasons (detail)
2002
© Damien Hirst and Science Ltd. All rights reserved. DACS 2012
Photographed by Prudence Cuming Associates
Damien Hirst

The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living  
1991

© Damien Hirst and Science Ltd. All rights reserved. DACS 2011
Photo: Photographed by Prudence Cuming Associates

Damien Hirst

Sympathy in White Major - Absolution II  
2006

© Damien Hirst and Science Ltd. All rights reserved. DACS 2011.
Photo: Photographed by Prudence Cuming Associates



Damien Hirst
Pharmacy
1992
© Tate

Damien Hirst

Beautiful, childish, expressive, tasteless, not art, over simplistic, throw away, kid’s stuff, lacking integrity, rotating, nothing but visual candy, celebrating, sensational, inarguably beautiful painting (for over the sofa)  
1996

© Damien Hirst and Science Ltd. All rights reserved. DACS 2011.
Photo: Photographed by Prudence Cuming Associates



Sunday, 18 March 2012

Review of the Crisis Commission at Somerset House


18/03/12
The Crisis Commission
Somerset House
14 March – 22 April 2012

“Bleak, dark, and piercing cold, it was a night for the well-housed and fed to draw round the bright fire, and thank God they were at home; and for the homeless starving wretch to lay him down and die.” (Charles Dickens, Oliver Twist)

As poignant now as in Dickensian times, this citation is wrapped around the astronomical globe, placed in lieu of a head, on Yinka Shonibare’s Homeless Man (2012), a life-sized model of a man bent double under the weight of 11 suitcases, precariously balanced, on his back. Carrying the burdens of his past life on his shoulders, this sculpture is one of 14 works of art by prominent artists (all but one of which were created specifically for this commission), in a new exhibition on show in the East Wing Galleries of Somerset House, in collaboration with Crisis, a national charity for single homeless people. Alongside these donated works, five pieces by artists who are themselves homeless or vulnerably housed are also on display. These bear testament to the benefits of Crisis, which, as well as formal learning opportunities providing a route back to paid employment, also offers a wide range of art activities, in the form of practical and creative workshops, for homeless people across the UK.


To read the rest of this review, please go to: http://blog.darlingcollective.com/?p=426

Tuesday, 13 March 2012

Review of Alberto Burri: Form and Matter at the Estorick Collection of modern italian art

13/03/12
Alberto Burri: Form and Matter
Estorick Collection of modern italian art
13 January – 7 April 2012

Despite considerable international attention during his lifetime, and being hailed in the USA as a significant influence on the abstract expressionists, Alberto Burri (1915-1995) has been largely overlooked in the UK, and the current exhibition at the Estorick Collection is his first major retrospective in this country.


Although the exhibition opens with some of his more rare figurative works from the late 1940s, the main body of the show focuses on his experimental abstract works, using a variety of materials, including sacking, cellotex (a type of insulating board), sand, sawdust, PVA glue, pumice stone, iron sheets and tar. In part inspired by Umberto Boccioni’s Technical Manifesto of Futurist Sculpture from 1912, which called upon artists to reject their exclusive use of “noble” materials such as bronze and marble, his incorporation of such common or garden materials was a clear forerunner of the arte povera movement of later years. Burri himself was, however, labelled as a leading protagonist of art informel, a European-wide trend which focused on the artistic process itself, as much as on the finished work. It is perhaps not surprising then, that, in 1954, he also began to work with fire, scorching his materials, thereby incorporating a greater element of chance into the procedure.


Born to a wine merchant father in the central Italian region of Umbria, Burri was trained in medicine, and served in the Second World War as a doctor in North Africa. From 1943 until the end of the war, however, he was interned in a prisoner-of-war camp in Hereford, Texas, which is where he first began to paint, turning to it as a replacement career in 1946. This background has clearly exerted an influence on his work, with his palette remaining simple, and comprising blacks, reds, and browns – the colours of heat, dryness, and blood. Red Plastic (1961), for example, made of plastic, acrylic, and scorching on cellotex, has a distinct medical look to it, with the wrinkled and shrunken plastic appearing like stretched skin, and the red as vivid as highly oxygenated blood. Similarly, many describe his sacking works, torn, wrinkled, rumpled, glued and sewn together, as resembling lacerated and stitched flesh. This is certainly a plausible impression, but not necessarily what Burri himself intended in his “poetic exploration of matter.”


The effects of charring in works such as Combustion (1958) (a title and date borne by several works in the exhibition), where pieces of paper are overlaid, creating a collage-like result, are dark and all-consuming, but actually not altogether different from the deep blackness of his paint and tar works (Tar II, 1949; Black T, 1951), and even from his later Black Plastic Combustion (1964), made of scorched plastic on board, which, even close up, could easily be mistaken for very very thick swirls of oil paint. It really does seem, then, as if Burri’s main concern was with experimentation with different materials and processes, with composition and with form, and not so much with representation or reference – even his titles refer to the materials and processes used.

In the 1970s, he produced a series of white work called Cretto, using cellotex surfaces, cracked with deep fissures, dehydrated and parched like the deserts of North Africa. Again, this is applying biographical detail where it maybe isn’t intended, but the intruding inferences are hard to overlook.


This is an exhibition which both invites and defies criticism. Faced with the works, one is overwhelmed by so many impressions and possible interpretations, feelings and responses, that a written account could almost never end, yet, at the same time, Burri himself insisted: “Words are no help to me when I try to speak about my painting, they talk around the picture. What I have to express appears in the picture.” And, so be it. I shall say no more. Go and see for yourselves!

Images:

Alberto Burri (1915 to 1995)
Sacking and Red, 1954
Acrylic and hessian collage on canvas
86.4 x 100.3 cm
Tate, London
© Fondazione Palazzo Albizzini, Collezione Burri, Città di Castello, 2012

Alberto Burri (1915 to 1995)
Red Plastic, 1961
Plastic, acrylic and scorch marks on cellotex
75 x 56 cm
© Fondazione Palazzo Albizzini, Collezione Burri, Città di Castello, 2012


Alberto Burri (1915 to 1995)
Combustion, 1961
Scorch marks, fabric, paper, acrylic and PVA glue on cardboard
22 x 17 cm
Fondazione Magnani Rocca
© Fondazione Palazzo Albizzini, Collezione Burri, Città di Castello, 2012

Alberto Burri (1915 to 1995)
White Cretto, 1975
Acrovinyl on cellotex
42 x 85 cm
Galleria delle Arti, Citta’ di Castello
© Fondazione Palazzo Albizzini, Collezione Burri, Città di Castello, 2012

Sunday, 11 March 2012

Review of Wilhelmina Barns-Graham: A Scottish Artist in St Ives at the Fleming Collection


11/03/12
Wilhelmina Barns-Graham: A Scottish Artist in St Ives

The Fleming Collection
10 January – 5 April 2012

“Wilhelmina Barns-Graham is usually regarded as a St. Ives School painter which does not do justice to the immense influence that Scotland had on her work,” says Selina Skipwith, Keeper of Art at The Fleming Collection. “The centenary of her birth provides us with an appropriate opportunity to set the record straight.” And so it is that the Collection is now hosting a small but thorough retrospective of the painter’s works, centering on this new thesis by curator and biographer Lynne Green, which highlights her prominent position as an abstract painter and colourist, greatly indebted and loyal to her Scottish roots.



To read the rest of this review, please go to: http://blog.darlingcollective.com/?p=413

Saturday, 10 March 2012

Review of Johan Zoffany RA: Society Observed at the Royal Academy of Arts


10/03/12
Johan Zoffany RA: Society Observed
Royal Academy of Arts, Sackler Wing
10 March – 10 June 2012

“Zoffany has come home!” says MaryAnne Stevens, Director of Academic Affairs at the Royal Academy of Arts and organising curator of the first exhibition of the works of Johannes Josephus Zauffaly (1733-1810), better known as Johan Zoffany, since 1977. And, indeed,  Zoffany was a very early member of the Academy, personally nominated by King George III himself a year after its founding, thus bypassing the election process to which he refused to submit. A great deal of research has been carried out on the German-born painter in the past 35 years, and this forms the basis of this new exhibition (and its accompanying catalogue), which, although relegated to the Sackler Wing (whilst Hockney continues to fill the main galleries downstairs), features over 60 oil paintings, alongside a selection of drawings and prints, some of which have rarely or never been exhibited before.


The exhibition is arranged thematically, and, according to its curator Martin Postle, “you get many different Zoffanys as you walk through this show.” A peripatetic artist with an “exceptional Wanderlust,” visitors are led on an “extraordinary adventure through his art and life.”


Born near Frankfurt in 1733, Zoffany trained as history painter, working with largely mythical (Greek) and Biblical subjects. However, when he came to England in 1760, he failed miserably to promote himself in this genre, and, his success plummeting, he turned to drawing portraits in pubs. Happily, his talent was recognised, and he was taken under the wing of Benjamin Wilson who, two years later, introduced him to the celebrated actor and theatre manager, David Garrick, an event which changed the course of his career. Taken to Garrick’s family home in Hampton, Zoffany painted four family portraits, including Mr and Mrs Garrick by the Shakespeare Temple at Hampton (ca. 1762), which so pleased its subject, that the artist was invited to begin working as a theatre portraitist. From his historical training, Zoffany had a good understanding of narrative, and knew how to capture moments of drama. This skill shone through in his theatre paintings, in which he often captured the most popular and exciting moment of the play, as, for example, in Samuel Foote as Major Sturgeon and Hayes as Sir Jacop Jollup in ‘The Mayor of Garret’ (1763-4), which depicts the comic highpoint at which, intending to draw a sword, the protagonist instead pulls out his walking stick!

Through his work with the stage, Zoffany grew to understand more of English society, but, despite the cosmopolitan scene, he still gravitated towards the Royal Court of George III and his German queen, Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz. Zoffany himself had been educated alongside German princes, and so, although quite often badly behaved, he nonetheless knew about etiquette. His portraits for the Royal Court are unique in their portrayal of the family within domestic settings and showing their human face. George III (1771), for example, depicts the king as a soldier rather than a monarch, emphasising his devout patriotism.


It was Queen Charlotte who asked Zoffany to travel to Florence and record the celebrated works of art on show in the Grand Ducal Gallery of the Uffizi (also known as the Tribuna). The resulting work, the rambunctious The Tribuna of the Uffizi (1772-77), is deemed by many to be his masterpiece, although its “improper” satirical elements, including the portrayal of painter, engraver and caricaturist Thomas Patch, who had been thrown out of Rome for his homosexual activity, pointing not, as expected, at the Venus de Milo, but rather at a sculpture of two male wrestlers, led to George III’s reluctance to buy the work (he eventually did, but it was relegated to Kew Palace), and, effectively, signaled the end of Zoffany’s court painting career.


Nevertheless, he went on to travel to India, according to one of his friends, “to roll in gold dust,” where he was picked up by Governor General, Warren Hastings, and introduced not only to the tea-drinking society of British India, but also the more native aspects of Indian India, as shown in the atmospherically lively Colonel Mordaunt’s Cock Match (ca. 1784-86). As Martin Postle puts it, this was not so much a passage to India, as a passage through India.


Returning to England in 1789, Zoffany continued as an active Academician, but his health slowly declined, and, ultimately, he developed dementia. The exhibition closes, as it opens, with a self-portrait, once again showing his intensity of observation. This work, Self-Portrait with Hookah (1800-03) is possibly his final portrait, and is a far cry from the Hogarthian Self-Portrait with Friar’s Habit (13 March 1979), painted on his 46th birthday, in which he scandalously hangs 2 condoms next to a string of rosary beads on the wall behind him!

It seems perhaps true then that there are many Zoffanys on show here, but, even if the exhibition is taken as a consistent progression through his life and works, there is certainly not a dull moment along the way. 

Images:

Johan Zoffany 
The portraits of the Academicians of the Royal Academy, 1771-2 
Oil on canvas 
100.1 x 147.5 cm 
The Royal Collection 
The Royal Collection Copyright 2011, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II

Johan Zoffany
Mr and Mrs Garrick by the Shakespeare Temple at Hampton, c. 1762
Oil on canvas
109.9 x 134.6 cm
Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection 

Johan Zoffany
Queen Charlotte, 1771
Oil on canvas
163.8 x 137.5 cm
The Royal Collection, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
Photo The Royal Collection copyright 2011, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 

Johan Zoffany
The Tribuna of the Uffizi, 1772-7
Oil on canvas
123.5 x 155 cm
The Royal Collection, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
Photo The Royal Collection copyright 2011, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 

Johan Zoffany
Colonel Mordaunt's Cock Match, 1784-86
Oil on canvas
103.9 x 150 x 2 cm
Tate, London: purchased with assistance from the National Heritage Memorial Fund, the National Art Collections Fund, the Friends of the Tate Gallery and a group of donors 1994.
Photo copyright Tate, London, 2011

This exhibition is co-organised by the Royal Academy of Arts and the Yale Center for British Art.